Editorial Standards & Principles
At Wellbeingmealsguide, we are committed to delivering accurate, evidence-based information about sustainable eating and cooking practices. Our editorial standards ensure every article meets rigorous criteria for quality, transparency, and integrity.
We believe in empowering readers with reliable guidance that respects their intelligence and supports their journey toward mindful, sustainable food choices.
The information on this site is for educational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional before making health decisions.
Our Core Editorial Principles
Rigorous Research
All content is grounded in peer-reviewed research, expert interviews, and credible scientific sources. We verify claims and update articles as new evidence emerges.
Complete Transparency
We disclose our sources, author expertise, and any affiliations. Readers always know who wrote an article, their credentials, and what research informed it.
Balanced Perspective
We acknowledge different viewpoints and scientific debate. When expert opinion varies, we present multiple perspectives fairly and allow readers to form informed conclusions.
Reader Wellbeing First
We never claim to replace professional guidance. Our role is to inform and educate, helping readers make choices aligned with their values and circumstances.
Our Fact-Checking Process
Every article undergoes multiple rounds of verification before publication. Here is how we ensure accuracy:
Research & Source Verification
Our writers compile evidence from peer-reviewed journals, established institutions, and recognized experts in sustainable food systems and nutrition science. We prioritize primary sources and cross-reference claims across multiple reputable references.
Editorial Review
A senior editor reviews all submissions for accuracy, clarity, and alignment with our editorial standards. This includes checking citations, methodology, and logical coherence. We question assumptions and push back on unsupported claims.
Expert Consultation
For specialized topics, we consult with subject-matter experts including food scientists, environmental specialists, and culinary professionals. Their feedback helps ensure technical accuracy and practical applicability.
Final Quality Check & Publication
Before going live, content undergoes a final proofread and fact-check. We verify all hyperlinks, citations, and dates are accurate. Once published, articles remain "live" for ongoing monitoring and updates.
Meet Our Editorial Team
Elena Rodríguez García
Editor-in-Chief
Elena brings 12 years of food journalism and environmental writing experience. She studied Environmental Science at Universidad de Bilbao and has written for leading Spanish and European food publications. Elena leads our editorial strategy and ensures all content meets our rigorous standards.
Javier Sanz Martín
Sustainability & Science Editor
Dr. Sanz holds a doctorate in Food Systems and Sustainability from Universidad Autónoma de Madrid. He reviews all articles for scientific accuracy and sources, coordinates expert consultations, and ensures our content reflects current research in sustainable food practices.
Mar Fernández López
Managing Editor & Fact-Checker
Mar is our lead fact-checker and managing editor with background in investigative journalism. She meticulously verifies sources, checks citations, and manages the editorial calendar. Mar ensures every article is reviewed and refined before publication.
Corrections & Updates Policy
How We Handle Errors
If you notice an error in our content—whether factual, technical, or editorial—we want to know. We take corrections seriously and update articles promptly. When a substantive error is corrected, we add a transparent correction note at the end of the article, visible to all readers, explaining what was changed and when.
Ongoing Updates
Content is not static. When new research emerges or practices evolve, we update articles to reflect the latest evidence. For significant updates, we note the revision date at the article's top. Minor clarifications or link updates may not receive a separate note but are always made to improve accuracy and reader experience.
Submitting Corrections
Found an error or have feedback about our content? We welcome reader input. Please contact our editorial team with:
- The article title and publication date
- Specific section or claim you're flagging
- Your concern and suggested correction
- Sources supporting your feedback (if available)
Email us at [email protected] with the subject line "Content Correction Request."
Response Timeline
We review all correction requests within five business days. If we confirm an error, we'll correct it and notify you of the update. If we respectfully disagree or need clarification, we'll explain our reasoning. This collaborative process helps us maintain trust and accuracy with our readers.
Our Commitment to You
Honest & Independent
We operate with editorial independence. Our writing is driven by evidence and reader interest, never by commercial pressure or advertiser influence.
Continuously Improving
We learn from reader feedback and evolving best practices in journalism and science communication. Our standards are never fixed—they evolve.
Inclusive & Accessible
We aim to make evidence-based food knowledge accessible to everyone, regardless of background or expertise level. No jargon without explanation.
Respectful Dialogue
We welcome questions, disagreement, and constructive criticism. Your voice helps us stay honest and connected to our readers' needs and concerns.
Questions About Our Editorial Process?
We're here to discuss our standards, answer questions about sourcing, or receive feedback about our content. Reach out to our editorial team directly.
Contact Our Editorial TeamCalle Sol 16, Bilbao | [email protected] | +34 486 610 934